<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Process vs Innovation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://exeedtechnology.com/process-vs-innovation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://exeedtechnology.com/process-vs-innovation</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 17:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://exeedtechnology.com/process-vs-innovation/comment-page-1#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 10:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exeedtechnology.com/?p=95#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>Jacob ..  totally agree.   The opportunity to innovate and improve process is nearly bottomless.  There isn't a single BP that can't be improved and as you say understanding exceptions is often a good way to do that.   Sometimes,of course implementing the process change requires more investment than the resulting benefits ....   but that's a blog for a different day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob ..  totally agree.   The opportunity to innovate and improve process is nearly bottomless.  There isn&#8217;t a single BP that can&#8217;t be improved and as you say understanding exceptions is often a good way to do that.   Sometimes,of course implementing the process change requires more investment than the resulting benefits &#8230;.   but that&#8217;s a blog for a different day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

