<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise Software Startup Valuation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://exeedtechnology.com/enterprise-software-startup-valuation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://exeedtechnology.com/enterprise-software-startup-valuation</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Ukelson</title>
		<link>http://exeedtechnology.com/enterprise-software-startup-valuation/comment-page-1#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Ukelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exeedtechnology.com/enterprise-software-startup-valuation#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I can't tell you the number of times that I have seen a VC backed startup turn down an interesting offer - not a blockbuster one, just a comfortable one, only to end up with a firesale a bit later. It is one of downsides of VC money - VC's need the blockbuster sale, not a comfortable one - and sometimes end up throwing out the baby with the bathwater. 

From a VC perspective - the chance of a blcokbuster is worth the risk of a possible firesale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I can&#8217;t tell you the number of times that I have seen a VC backed startup turn down an interesting offer - not a blockbuster one, just a comfortable one, only to end up with a firesale a bit later. It is one of downsides of VC money - VC&#8217;s need the blockbuster sale, not a comfortable one - and sometimes end up throwing out the baby with the bathwater. </p>
<p>From a VC perspective - the chance of a blcokbuster is worth the risk of a possible firesale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Drumgoole</title>
		<link>http://exeedtechnology.com/enterprise-software-startup-valuation/comment-page-1#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Drumgoole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exeedtechnology.com/enterprise-software-startup-valuation#comment-342</guid>
		<description>The problem with Cape Clear is they raised too much money too fast and failed to convert that capital into a significant sales or technology advantage. From first mover in the Webservices space the declined into a "me too" player and then turned down several earlier and more attractive acquisition offers by other companies. 

In the end the Workday acquisition will be at a firesale price which will leave very little for the earlier investors and/or common stock holders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Cape Clear is they raised too much money too fast and failed to convert that capital into a significant sales or technology advantage. From first mover in the Webservices space the declined into a &#8220;me too&#8221; player and then turned down several earlier and more attractive acquisition offers by other companies. </p>
<p>In the end the Workday acquisition will be at a firesale price which will leave very little for the earlier investors and/or common stock holders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
